- Cyprus : President parks on double yellow line
- air travel : Fresh calls for Eurocypria merger as CY flounders
- transport : Our View: State cannot give in to every trivial demand from...
- Cyprus : UN hopes leaders can ‘break the back’ of property issue
- Cyprus : Blaze threatens homes in Troodos foothills
- Cyprus : First rains fall in Larnaca
- Crime : Five day remand after farm arrest
- bats : Fruit bats on the brink of extinction
- Cyprus : Russian billionaire Abramov gets Cypriot citizenship
- agriculture : Five million kilos of excess grapes
Is the government coalition unravelling?
Topic tags
CyprusUNCERTAINTY REIGNS over the future of the government coalition with the domestic political front showing signs of disarray in the wake of the UN Secretary-General’s visit and the conclusion of the intensified negotiations.
Following President Demetris Christofias’ briefing of the National Council on Friday, rumblings are once again being heard among government partners DIKO and EDEK regarding their potential departure from the coalition. Despite informing party leaders of the areas where convergence had been found, the president was only able to win the backing of his own party AKEL regarding his handling of the talks, with even pro-solution DISY keeping a distance.
Both DIKO and EDEK will hold key meetings this week, with EDEK’s central committee convening tomorrow and DIKO’s executive office holding discussions on Tuesday, where the question of abandoning ship will be posed.
The constant talk of withdrawing from government can be seen as a sustained effort to put pressure on Christofias’ positions in the talks, said former president Georgios Vassiliou.
“It’s not usual in a democratic society to participate in a coalition and to keep repeating publicly that they want to withdraw from government. Those kinds of statements have only one objective, to exercise pressure on the president to modify his stance on the negotiations,” said Vassiliou.
EDEK vice-president Sofoclis Sofocleous said yesterday that talk of leaving the government was justified. “It is to be expected, and I would say normal, since EDEK has political differences with the president’s positions and decisions on the Cyprus problem. I don’t think this is something new. The question is whether now is the time for quitting the government. The central committee will answer that.”
EDEK spokesman Demetris Papadakis spoke of the need for a new strategy in the talks. He criticised Christofias for not withdrawing his proposal for a rotating presidency when he had the chance. Asked about leaving government, he said the main factor influencing his party’s support of the president was the national issue, implying that it was the existence or not of this support which would determine EDEK’s participation in government.
DIKO spokesman Fotis Fotiou yesterday confirmed that three members of the executive office raised the issue of leaving the coalition on Friday: Andreas Angelides, Nicolas Papadopoulos and Kyriacos Kenevezos. The three have expressed their opposition to Christofias’ proposals in the talks on a rotating presidency, allowing 50,000 settlers to stay, weighted voting, and problem-solving mechanisms.
Angelides even warned yesterday that the future of the Republic of Cyprus was at risk. “What’s important now is not whether we will stay in government or not, but how we can save the Republic of Cyprus.”
Fotiou noted that if a decision was taken to leave the government on Tuesday, then it would be raised at the central committee meeting the following week. However, he said: “As things stand, I don’t see it happening, that is for the majority of the executive office to decide to leave the government, but you can’t prejudge these things.”
DIKO member and Foreign Minister Marcos Kyprianou had a different view: “If we felt that there was a policy which was putting the Republic at risk, we should have walked out a long time ago, and I would not have stayed in government either.”
Opposition DISY leader Nicos Anastassiades also failed to talk up the talks and the announcement of “significant progress”.
While some steps forward have been taken, differences remain, he said, noting that it has taken 18 months to discuss governance, while key issues like property, territory, security, Turkish troops and settlers have yet to be discussed. He noted that the president had failed to get the consensus of members of the National Council, resulting in disagreement over his handling of the talks and their content.
Some observers believe DISY is making a tactical move in an effort to pass on the message to Christofias that their support should not take them for granted.
Meanwhile, EVROKO leader Demetris Syllouris yesterday continued the campaign to remove UN Special Adviser Alexander Downer, saying he was undermining the negotiations process. The Australian diplomat faced a barrage of criticism from EDEK, DIKO, EVROKO and the Greens on Friday for his alleged involvement in Ban Ki-moon’s visit to Mehmet Ali Talat’s offices, something which the UN has consistently denied.
Former president Vassiliou said Downer was being used a scapegoat by those who were not happy with the negotiations. “Any attacks on Mr Downer have nothing to do with Mr Downer himself, but are going against the negotiations rather than the person who in no way can be blamed for anything.”
“Downer is simply a coordinator, and enjoys the full trust of the UN in any case,” he added.


Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:
Yeap
Chris comments:
It's easy for us to judge politicians quickly and say they are corrupted, greedy etc. Without saying they are not, the Cyprus problem due to its idiomorphous nature is impossible to solve without taking into account the foreign interests and other factors that influence the decision of our "leaders". Unfortunately personal interests are also taken into account. I find that the president's approach for solution "by Cypriots for Cypriots" may sound good but let's be honest here..it's not realistic.
I also think that the rotating presidency is wrong as i strongly believe that the president should not be dependent on its ethnicity but nationality(Cypriot). Do we always want the president to be elected based on his ethnicity? I understand that this is an effort to gain the trust of the T/c but don't we see that this in the long term is wrong? I would support this only if it had an expiry date, say in 25 years from now. This way we would all work towards a better united Cyprus rather than distinguishing its people to Turks or Greeks in every layer of the society.
I also don't agree with the large number of turkish settlers to remain on the island. It may sound harsh but yes the illegal settlement is considered a war crime and should be treated like one. How is the settlement that Turkey imposed all of a sudden became our problem? They put those people there(maybe not their option) and they(Turkey)knew the risks. Why should the Cypriot refugee pay the price again of not being able to use his land or property to his own will due to the Turkish plans of colonising the occupied areas? Turkey should take full responsibility of their actions on this issue.
Again, i understand that trying to establish a federal solution would require a set of measures to ensure that this is maintained fair and just for both, Greek and Turkish Cypriots. Maybe i'm thinking ahead of my time but if we want to ensure the unity maybe we should also be considering measures on how this federation could evolve in 20 or 30 years time. Times change, situations change...the cyprus issue has remained unchanged for half a century now. Compromises are to be made from both but this is not to sacrifice the human rights. A solution should be built on these human rights.
Thank you.
Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:
You neglect to mention that your dog does not have a muzzle on. It instead has a muzzle on its "master". That dog I would kick any day. Considering the damage it has inflicted and the fact that it still has its teeth well immersed into Cypriot flesh, euthanasia may be in order.
'
Underneath it all Cypriots must muster the strength to ask a crucial question: should an 18% minority impose its will on an 82% majority?
ben dover comments:
Kyriacos, bravo!
but it gives me no pleasure to say your comment was spot on. Those on either side that have the power and perks and their nose in the trough are only concerned that they want to hold onto them come hell or high water, whatever the cost, even partition, which of course would be a victory for the fat cats on both sides, not the refugees from Famagusta or crumbling Varosha.
Antifon
Your last sentence regarding an alternative is no alternative.
The crucial question all Cypriots must ask is "what the hell are our politicians doing for the PEOPLE of our country"?
If you were to go to the cease fire line and watch the traffic of greek speakers and turkish speakers going in either direction without animosity you would ask yourself why is it so hard to move forward together?
Or are the previously mentioned words of Harold MacMillan uttered in another age over fifty years ago about to haunt you?
think about this....if you told me you wanted to be my friend, and we could be buddies, but kept kicking my dog - would i trust you?
Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:
Morons they may be. Or, equally possible, corrupt & greedy.
'
Underneath it all Cypriots must muster the strength to ask a crucial question: should an 18% minority impose its will on an 82% majority?
'
That injustice was cultivated against the will of the majority in 1960 and produced predictable outcomes. Should it be allowed to continue?
'
Shouldn't we all feel morons when the country that advocates division across ethnic lines, in its own home pursues policies of forced assimilation unsuccessfully for the last 9 decades almost?
'
Unfortunately, until Turkey changes herself we are doomed to be governed by the dilemma: accept the 1960/1974 HUGE injustice or wait it out until our occupier comes to her senses?
'
There is really no good answer.
Kyriacos Roumbas from Cyprus comments:
I would like to know what business interests some of these politicians have, what parts of Cyprus their interests are in, and whether it would effect their pockets if a solution is found?
I would not be surprised if some of the GC politicians,their families and friends have too much to loose with a solution to the Cyprus problem! The biggest problem we have is greed and corruption and if these issues amongst other are not addressed first we can never move forward.
I have always said that what ever party comes into power they are the same here in Cyprus. They look after their own first and if there are any crumbs left over they might give them out, but most of the time they also keep the crumbs for themselves, family and friends.
Why don't our politicians stop blaming each other and unite for if our politicians can not unite over such a common cause as solving the Cyprus problem how can the Cypriots become united over a common cause as the solution and a United Cyprus when they are putting borders between their own people? Come on which other country will distinguish what political party you belong to only by seeing what make of beer and coffee one drinks or which football team one supports, very sorrowful state of affairs we have here in Cyprus.
SADLY GREED AND CORRUPTION IS THE ORDER OF THE DAILY LIFE IN CYPRUS AND OUR POLITICIANS BLAMING EACH OTHER FOR WHAT GOES WRONG IN DAILY LIFE OR TRYING TO SOLVE THE CYPRUS PROBLEM!
Joe Citizen from Limassol comments:
Mustafa Anlar from Nicosia- Thank you for a candid and reslistic ipinion. There are indeed petty politics at play in the north as well and it is clear that suport for a solution is not as well cemented together in both sides.
Stavros from London comments:
It looks like once again Cyprus will never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity!
There needs to be a wake up call to all the nationalists of EDEK/DIKO/UBP/DP - the status quo of non-solution will have to come to an end. Turkey wants in to the EU, and Greece wants a thaw in relations with Turkey.
We will either have a united Cyprus based on a bi-communal federation, or we will have permanent partition. DIKO and the hardliners are attacking the talks, Downer et al because they really want permanaent partition of our island. They can't say so of course, but making impossible demands makes it more likely.
This week wealmost saw the collapse of the Northern Ireland settlement, but Sinn Fein and the DUP compromised to keep it on track. I want to go back home to a united Cyprus, but I feel our small-minded politicians will prevent me from doing so.
Tony from Cyprus comments:
What the hell is going on, for me and many others Cyprus issue is becaming or has became another 'social relegious political' mess not as deep or bad as the middle east issues but became a 'not my problem' issues by ALL sides...
This is effecting the social, economic and long term progress of the Island which is playing into the hands of the 'enemies of the state' making them very happy...
This issue has so much dark past's, egos and unresolved issues that only if the people that what a new direction and 'solution' need to stand up and be heard.
What Cyprus needs is for a social movement of change that will effect all-sides political and economcic status, remember we are they one's paying for most of their economic well-being, we have the 'power' to a point to begin Change.
If that is not the case then 'our past colonial master may had a sorry to say a valid point, ''give peasants power and within a number of years they will through it away'' a shitass Lord Macmillan said it at a social party back in 1958.
We might rise our eyes to that statement but it looks like its true were I am sitting from!
People, Parties and ego's GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER, ASAP, PLS.
Disappointed from Cyprus comments:
More petty politics. If a solution is to be acquired, All the parties must pull their weight to a common goal.
I agree with Mr Vassiliou that conscienceless parties are using Mr Downer as a scapegoat, so that they can upset the negotiations to the utmost. These men and women are not true Cypriots seeking the best for their country; they are unpatriotic, egocentric morons with no more sense than a sparrow's brain.