US collectors to regain right to trade ancient Cyprus coins

By Patrick Dewhurst Published on February 25, 2010

AMERICAN antiques collectors could soon regain the right to trade freely in ancient Cypriot coins, it emerged this week.

This news follows a row over the import and sale of ancient coins in the US, after customs officials seized USD $275 worth of coins minted in Cyprus and China.

Asked about the coins, Maria Hadjicostis, Director of the Antiquities Department, said yesterday, “Loss of antiquities is a problem, and from a legal perspective, we treat coins just like any antiquities. There is no difference.”

Asked about their value, she said, “There is not much financial value in antiquities, but the coins are not just money.

“They are important archaeological items, because they can be accurately dated and used for historical study.”

Hadjicostis said it was impossible to say how many ancient Cypriot coins were currently on the international market.

The 23 coins, of which seven were minted in Cyprus during the reign of Alexander the Great, were allegedly bought from a dealer in London by an American coin collectors group, the Ancient Coin Collectors’ Guild (ACCG)

Baltimore customs officials seized the coins because of bilateral Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with China and Cyprus to restrict the sale of cultural property.

Upon signing the MOU, Former Director of Cyprus’ Department of Antiquities, Pavlos Flourenzos told the organisation Saving Antiquities for Everyone (SAFE), “This act shows sensitivity to the importance of preserving world cultural heritage, a principle highly esteemed by the international scientific community.”

According to US law, customs officials were therefore required to bring forfeiture action, which the collectors could challenge by producing the coins’ sale history, or “provenance”.

The ACCG did not produce a provenance, and could not demonstrate that they had come from a reputable source so US Customs retained the coins for nine months. ACCG is now suing both Customs and the US State Department (DOS), who signed the MOU, for arbitrarily applying import restrictions on ancient coins and taking the coins without filing forfeiture action.

The ACCG said in a press release last week “after behind-the-scenes lobbying orchestrated by Cypriot advocacy groups, the DOS failed to follow the recommendations of its own experts on the Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) by extending restrictions to Cypriot coins, and then misled Congress about this decision.”

If the court decides in the favour and declares that the restrictions are illegal, the coins will be returned and sales imports can continue.

The guild told Baltimore’s Courthouse News Service last week, “The Guild says customs seized the coins because it could not establish a chain of custody beyond receipt from a reputable source.

“Historical coins have actively been traded for at least 500 years as collectibles. Due to their usual modest value and the huge numbers extant, historical coins are typically traded without any provenance information or documentary history as to where and when they were found.”

Tue, March 2nd 2010 at 00:02

David Gill from Swansea, Wales, UK comments:

Are archaeological sites on Cyprus being damaged and / or destroyed to provide material for the antiquities market? What are the sources for recently surfaced coins that do not have collecting histories?

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the US State Department and Cyprus seeks to protect the cultural heritage of Cyprus.

Why does the ACCG wish to remove the MOU? What are the motives of their members?

For a different view of this story:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/looting-matters-do-coin-collecto...

Tue, March 2nd 2010 at 00:01

David Gill from Swansea, Wales, UK comments:

Are archaeological sites on Cyprus being damaged and / or destroyed to provide material for the antiquities market? What are the sources for recently surfaced coins that do not have collecting histories?

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the US State Department and Cyprus seeks to protect the cultural heritage of Cyprus.

Why does the ACCG wish to remove the MOU? What are the motives of their members?

For a different view of this story:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/looting-matters-do-coin-collecto...

Mon, March 1st 2010 at 23:59

David Gill from Swansea, Wales, UK comments:

Are archaeological sites on Cyprus being damaged and / or destroyed to provide material for the antiquities market? What are the sources for recently surfaced coins that do not have collecting histories?

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the US State Department and Cyprus seeks to protect the cultural heritage of Cyprus.

Why does the ACCG wish to remove the MOU? What are the motives of their members?

For a different view of this story:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/looting-matters-do-coin-collecto...

Thu, February 25th 2010 at 21:52

Peter Tompa from Washington, DC, USA comments:

Thank you for publicizing this lawsuit. Adding to Wayne Sayles' comments, the lawsuit also seeks to establish that US coin collectors should not be required to produce detailed information concerning the provenance for the coins they import, which is very likely unavailable given the low value and common nature of most ancient coins. Ancient Cypriot coins are widely collected in Europe (including Cyprus) without requiring such information, and it is unreasonable to assume that US collectors can easily produce information not required of others. In addition, the plaintiffs in the case have uncovered evidence suggesting that the decision to restrict Cypriot coins was made against the recommendations of the State Department's own a body of experts, based on behind-the-scenes lobbying orchestrated by US archaeologists. Like their Cypriot counterparts, Americans who collect ancient Cypriot coins do so out of love for history and a sincere appreciation of Cyprus' magnificent ancient cultures. Cyprus is certainly entitled to seek to prevent looting of its archaeological sites, but it is unfair to do so by placing restrictions on all coins of Cypriot type rather than on coins traced back to illicit digs on Cyprus. For more about the lawsuit (as well as a link to the Complaint), see http://www.accg.us/issues/news/ancient-coin-collectors-seek-judicial-rev...

Sincerely,

Peter Tompa
Attorney for Plaintiff, Ancient Coin Collectors Guild.

Thu, February 25th 2010 at 20:57

wayne g. sayles from Missouri, USA comments:

It should be made clear that the ACCG purposely imported coins without provenance to launch a test of the legality of these import restrictions. The coins were properly declared and customs officials were notified by the ACCG in advance that these coins should be seized and are part of a legal test case. The ACCG does not contest the right of ROC to ban the export of coins found in Cyprus, nor of the U.S. State Department to impose import restrictions under fair and judicious application of the laws in the U.S. The guild does contest the manner in which the Cypriot and Chinese Memorandums of Understanding were processed and argues that the decisions were arbitrary and capricious. The guild also contests the restriction of coins by "type" when they cannot be proven to have been exported from Cyprus since the signing of the MOU. Preserving the world's cultural heritage is a cause that the ACCG shares with archaeologists and with the Cypriot government. We do not share the opinion that disenfranchising private collectors is an effective means to that end.

Wayne G. Sayles
Executive Director, Ancient Coin Collectors Guild