- Cyprus : Huge chemical fire raises safety questions
- public transport : Our View: New public transport system needs more promotion
- air travel : Ryanair announces second route
- Cyprus : ‘Christofias wants to close a deal at all costs’
- Cyprus : Home price slump in slowdown
- Cyprus : PASYDY slams move to cut civil servants’ expenses
- Cyprus : School year starts with the promise of reforms
- Cyprus : Historic new charter for Cyprus Church
- Crime : Shop alarm rang for three hours after robbery
- Cyprus : Green light for Harvard-TEPAK deal
Our View: A very peculiar type of free speech
Topic tags
OpinionsAFTER a six-month absence, the ultra-nationalist youth group ELAM (National Popular Front) was back on Nicosia’s streets on Tuesday. A group of a few hundred youths, mostly teenagers, dressed in black T-shirts and faded jeans marched to the Ledra Palace checkpoint, in disciplined, army formation, chanting aggressive slogans against alleged traitors and the Turks. It was an anti-occupation march to mark the anniversary of the invasion.
Appearances often deceive but people who saw them could easily have mistaken them for a group of neo-fascist youths. Any doubts about the group’s politics were dispelled when one of the group’s leaders spotted two young Asians walking on the pavement and went wild. He started screaming abuse at them and threateningly headed in their direction, at which point the two Asians ran away as fast as they could.
A second incident took place on the same night, after the end of the demonstration. A group of baton-wielding, youths in ELAM T-shirts chased a black man on Makarios Avenue in Nicosia. In his effort to escape, the terrified man was hit by passing car at which point he fell to the pavement and the thugs started beating him. Fortunately he did not suffer serious injuries. The thugs also caused damage to the car.
The inclination is to dismiss such incidents as the acts of a tiny fringe group, run by a few brainless, testosterone-fuelled youths, who deserve to be ignored. This would be a big mistake, because society’s indifference would only help strengthen these ultra-nationalist bullies, who have filled Limassol’s walls with slogans.
In fairness they have never hidden their racist and extreme right wing beliefs. A few days before the end of last year they held a march in Nicosia protesting about the presence of illegal immigrants and attempted to turn Greek Cypriots against foreigners, with the main message, “Every foreign worker equals an unemployed Greek person.” The movement’s blog was more honest about its ideology, claiming that illegal immigration diluted the racial identity of the Greek community, turning it into “a bastardised, multi-cultural mass without a national conscience.” Last May the movement held an event to honour “the life and works of Nicos Sampson.”
Normally, the best way to deal with such crude publicity-seeking, calculated to provoke, is to ignore it, but it is very difficult to do so in an environment in which extremist, intolerant nationalism is fast becoming mainstream. We are living in a society in which leading politicians openly defend aggressively threatening behaviour as part of the right to freedom of expression. Anyone who heard the chants of the marchers would know that their racism is integrally bound to fascistic, nationalist philosophy.
Top politicians, including party leaders, championed the right of bloggers to call journalists they disagreed with ‘arse-wipes of the Turks’ and ‘traitors’ who deserved to be killed, in the name of free speech. A serving foreign minister, during the Papadopoulos presidency, defended the bullying and verbal abuse directed at demonstrators calling for the opening of the Ledra Street checkpoint, by ultra-nationalists, in the name of free speech. We have reached the stage at which it is legitimate to intimidate and terrorise people whose views we disagree with.
It is a very peculiar type of free speech which sets the worst possible example for young impressionable minds. It legitimises the fascistic, dogmatic thinking of groups like ELAM and helps its recruitment drive. After all, showing no tolerance for the opposing view and abusing people we disagree with has become a human right in our society, championed by top politicians and party leaders.
Several political parties, commendably, issued statements condemning the racist attack and slammed the behaviour of ELAM which was described as fascist, extremist, and ultra-nationalist among other things. But it is not only the racist, violent behaviour that should have been slammed – their intolerant, aggressive ultra-nationalism which could eventually pose a threat to our democracy and our liberties should also have been castigated by the political parties.
Perhaps this was too much to expect, at a time when threatening behaviour and bullying is considered part of the right to free speech. But we should consider that the violence against a defenceless Nigerian on Tuesday could at some point be directed against a treacherous supporter of re-unification, for his ‘lack of a national conscience’.

The Original Peter comments:
JA you either can't read English are totally blind to anything that you don't want to see. I never condoned the killing of Solomou in any way in my letter. You asked the question why no one has been convicted for that killing and in reply I asked why no one had been convicted for killing of the Turkish Soldier which seems to me a fairly balanced approach. You say "It is a typical Turkish tactic to avoid responsibility for their actions or justify their actions by bringing up completely unrelated or fabricated events." Was this event fabricated? Did you not read the CNN link? But, of course CNN are American and the USA is one of your bogeymen so undoubtedly it is a pack of lies! Ah, but it was only propaganda; this man was killed either by the British or the Turks themselves blah, blah, blah!
The Turks never raised the issue, I did, and unlike you I belong to no propaganda machine that keeps churning out one sided garbage as it has done for the last fourty years.
The death of the soldier could not be an excuse for the "lynching" of Solomou because it happened after the Solomou incident. So obviously you did not properly read the link.
Both sides committed acts against against the other but you, as you said in an earlier letter, do not agree with this well documented analysis. Obviously not well documented in Greek Cyprus!
Also why when discussing Cyprus do you keep raising the Armenian problem? What on earth has this got to do with Cyprus? NOTHING! It is just another excuse for some more Turk bashing and not constructive in any way!
John Alexander from London comments:
Peter. Since you insist.
It is a typical Turkish tactic to avoid responsibility for their actions or justify their actions by bringing up completely unrelated or fabricated events. Thus, the genocide of the Armenians is justified or denied on the grounds that it was, in fact, the Armenians who were killing Turks; the Constantinople pogrom in 1955 is not the responsibility of the Turkish state but a result of 'rising tensions' in Cyprus; and the Turkish invasion of Cyprus was not some well-planned exercise in ethnic cleansing of the Greek Cypriots but a response to Greek Cypriots ethnic cleansing TCs.
And, now, you give us the death of a Turkish soldier to excuse or justify the lynching of Isaac and the murder of Solomou. You have a sick mentality; which is even sicker if one considers that there is no evidence whatsoever that this soldier was killed by the Greek side. In fact, if he had been, can you imagine the fuss the Turkish side would have created and continued to create? But after initially trying to blame the Greek side for this man's death, I note that the Turks stopped making this allegation. You, Peter, seem to be the only left who believes this blatant piece of propaganda, which most other Turks are too embarrassed to repeat.
supporttheunderdog comments:
I would just like to add the Turkish failure to honour the Ankara protocol is an utter disgrace and I consider that the EU should meet out to the Turks the same as they apply to any EU country or its citizens, namely banning their aircraft from EU air space, their ships from EU waters and trucks from EU Roads.
supporttheunderdog comments:
JA- the Turkish Invasion did not just happen- it happened becuase in 1963 ceratin prominent elements within the GC side casme up with the Acritas Plan, intended to faciliate disenfrancisement of the TC population, It happendf because in 1974 the Grerek Junta aided and abetted by certain GC interests launched a coup against big Mak: as Big Mak put itm the Greeks invaded Cyprus.
yes the turkish Invasion is uillegal- yes the settlers should all go home, yes all all Cypriots should get their property back or proper compensation for it (and that includes the disposed Turkish Cypriots with propert in the South) but until youand your kind recognise that what ever the many greivous faults there were on the pasrt of Turkey and certain T/C elementsd, like the grey wolves, all of which are to be consdemned, there were inequities perpaetred on the T.C community, ie fellow Cypriots, there is no hope for what we all want, namely removal of the Turkish occupying forces.
The Original Peter from UK comments:
These comments are a farce. Various people slagging each other off and no responses from the GC propaganda dept to any comment that doesn't agree with their point of view. I thought that these comment sections were for people to debate sensibly and intelligently but obviously I was deluded.
I am still waiting to find out why the person who shot a Turkish border guard has not yet been brought to Justice but as usual there is a deathly hush! They obviously don't know about it so perhaps they should open the following link and enlighten themselves.
http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/08/cyprus/index.html
While not in anyway condoning the killing of Solomou, he had the choice about his actions, the Turkish border guard did not. He was a conscript who had to be where he was because he was ordered to.
MichaelA comments:
.. for now its not dependent. But when they tire of Turkey's little Islamic adventure ( reverting to type, I guess), no more preferable trade deals. How can you trust Hoja Ergodan who embraces with open arms an indicted war criminal from Sudan and who buys nuclear material from Iran. The defining moment was the refusal of Turkey to accept a Dane as NATO Secretary General. Why? Because of a cartoonist? If the West had any lingering doubts of where Turkey's natural allegiances were, they were certainly brutally confirmed that day. Your right, Cyprus may be divided for good but Turkey will never be let into the EU.
Loriot from Lapta comments:
Your doomsday scenario is wishful thinking, J.A.
It is not Cyprus that is in the way of Turkey's EU membership. Firstly, this possibility is years away, and secondly it will be scuppered by referenda in France, Germany and others. By that time Cyprus will have been divided for good.
Turkey is not dependent on EU membership.
John Alexander from London comments:
Good comments, Mike and Marcus.
I read in the Cypriot press this morning that the Turk foreign minister has told his EU counterparts that Turkey will not abide by its commitment to implement the Ankara protocol extending the customs union to Cyprus and that he expects the EU to choose between 'powerful' Turkey and 'tiny' Cyprus.
This reveals that the intercommunal talks are a charade, Turkey has no interest in a solution that aims at reunification of the island, and that its intention is to collapse the talks and seek upgrading of the occupation regime. The problem with this is that it would scupper Turkey's EU ambitions; which is why the Turks are trying to bludgeon their way into the EU, by boasting about how the EU needs them. Except the EU doesn't work this way and all these Turkish threats won't get them anywhere. Likely scenario, therefore, is: talks collapse; Turks seek upgrade of pseudo-state; Turkey's EU accession grinds to a halt; Islamist-secularist tensions rise in Turkey; Kurdish conflict intensifies; Turkey alienated from West drawn to Iran and Pakistan. And all this so that they can build casinos in occupied Cyprus.
NewYorke comments:
Yep - one day the Kurds will unite and then Allah had better help Ankara.
Mike comments:
The Turkish Community of Northern Cyprus is a mill stone around the throat of Turkey.
Turkey deserves what she gets including the Kurdish problem.
Turkey has been responsible for the murder of millions of people over the last 100 years and one day will suffer the same indignation as other countries when Turkey disintegrates into a number of smaller countries.
Sow and so shall you reap.
Marcus comments:
Fevzi from London & Kyrenia (Sun, July 25th 2010 at 09:36) Very soon there will be no real Turkish Cypriots to negotiate with for as you would be aware Turkey has 40,000 troops and 180,000 illegal settlers thus changing the demographics.
I have said it before and I will say it again, “the so called talks are a bloody waste of time and should be halted immediately”.
It is quite clear that Ankara plans to remain in occupation of the Northern area indefinitely.
Christofas should call the bluff of the gutless UN and EU, stop talking and veto any further progress for Turkey in the EU or anywhere else until his governments rights over the whole republic have been restored.
In the meantime he should also close the crossings along the greenline and withdraw privileges from any person who wants to have his cake and eat it.
In other words any person who wants to be first and foremost a Turk and yet enjoy the privileges of being a Cypriot and an EU citizen.
Kiran from Bogaz comments:
A very open and informative article. This type of youth behaviour was prevalent between 1950s - 1970s on the island. Anyone who wants to read Bitter Lemons of Cyprus (Lawrence Durrel) will see in the later chapters how gradually the eoka/enosis fanatics turned on the ordinary GCs accusing them of treachery for simply mixing with the British (of whom they killed many). The test is whether the GC authorities have the willpower to implement justice on GCs who commit crimes on non-GCs. Us TCs of course have our own idea of guaranteed justice - separate states, thankfully safe from these types of gangs who murdered TCs for too many years prior to August 1974.
Bill from Limassol comments:
Andreas.. you are of course correct. I'm sure though both sides have their extremists who will not hesitate to use violence to forward their view. This is not just a 'right-wing thing'. How many did Stalin murder? Extremism at either end of the scale is equally distasteful but since most of the media is under socialist control a rather distorted picture gets painted. In the UK for example racist attacks by nonwhites on whites hardly ever reach the press as it is not good to have to admit this actually happens, yet every attack by a white on another is automatically 'racially motivated' and receives unlimited press coverage. The politicians who perpetrate this corruption will only ever achieve one thing :- free votes for the extremists yet they make the loudest noise when that actually happens!
Brennan from Pretoria, South Africa comments:
In Yugoslavia there was interethnic peace which lasted for several decades. During those times, freedom of expression was severely curtailed and the authorities were willing and able to clamp down in a very heavy-handed manner on all sorts of groups that threatened intercommunal peace and harmony (the equivalents of ELAM/Grey Wolves etc). Once that heavy-handed strict, often brutal enforcement mechanism collapsed, the country rapidly descended into chaos. Neither the Europeans nor the Americans managed to save the country from self-destruction.
Andreas comments:
It is not free speech at all and an utter disgrace to call it so. The point of freedom is that you can do what you like as long as it doesn't infringe the basic rights of others. Chasing people down and attacking them is nothing of the sort.
Bill from Limassol comments:
Socialism in europe has caused the right wing to gain a foothold. European governments have ignored the indigenous populations fears over uncontrolled immigration and the forced acceptance of incompatible religions (who take advantage of the socialist idealistic nature). Across europe every dissenter of the good socialist message leaves you labelled ' a knuckle-dragging thug'. they're losing their grip (the socialists/communists) and they know it!
The solution? Listen to the people! If uncontrolled immigration leads to loss of work, lower wages, better treatment of the foreigner than yourself, (nevermind forcing you to accept and promoting a foreign religion) and your pleas for help are brushed aside, then what is your alternative? ELAM, BNP ETC ETC ETC.
SADLY THIS IS NOT ON THE (SOCIALIST / COMMUNIST) AGENDA. KEEPING YOU INLINE AND CONTROLLED IS.
However if the socialists / communists were ever to do this, it would mean admitting their great social and economic experiment, (THE EU), had failed. As they won't do that, they'll leave disaffected people to seek redress in the only other method they have. Work it out...it's not rocket science!
bang comments:
you guys r such kids, dont make this island suffer from all this crap from both sides, its such a lovely place, you guys were living together before you can live together again, show some tolerance, there is a solution to everything, both sides committed blunders and they should be sorry, this is a game played by politicians, most of the turkish cypriots politicians hold greek cypriots passports so they can travel freely around the world and then they speak about a separate state what a load of crap, show some common sense, turkish cypriots are lonely and they need greek cypriots to support them to be good economically and greek cypriots need the whole country reunited as it is important for the future of the island, so cut this crap and learn to live together, make cyprus a better place to live, i am not european or turkish or greek cypriot but i love this island i call it my 2nd home and i feel sad to see it divided. you people have potential and it would be good to use it for good purpose.
Hassan Kemal from UK/Kyrenia comments:
I was born and brough up in Kyrenia like Talat and Kalyoncu.
Sometimes when you speak the truth they don't like it.
Most Turkish Cypriots would like to see Turkey leave Cyprus but they are too scared to speak out.
We also have some collaborators (isbirlikci).
I think we should pay the collaborators few hundred thousand euros each to go and settle in Turkey. we should also take their EU passports away from them.
Hassan Kemal from UK/Kyrenia comments:
Hello Christoph,
Every nation goes through a bad period and Turkey is going through that period now.
Do you remember the colonels in Greece. Hundreds of students were butchered by Gizikis and his followers and look at Greece now ?
Member of an elite club.
I think given time it will settle down and common sense will prevail. Same will happen to North Korea and all the other countries that are on this path.
One day Turkey will realise that it is time to move out of Cyprus.
However, I can't see this in the very near future as almost all of the current Turkish Cypriot elected leaders!!!! are arse lickers
As a Cypriot I would like to see my country united and free of all foreign troops.
Christoph from USA comments:
Interesting to hear the turk side comment on Free Speech and Freedom of the Press, since Turkey has none of these. They only Free Press in Turkey is the one approved by the DEEP STATE. Like most fascist nation, freedom is subject to whats allowed by the central authority.
John Alexander from London comments:
Quite right, Michael A, bringing up the issue of the lynching of Solomou and the murder of Isaac at Dherynia in 1996. Here, we have an example of real fascist, racist violence. Were any charges brought against the cowards who committed these atrocities? Was there any soul-searching by the Turkish side regarding the barbarism they sank to? Have any apologies ever been issued to the families? Any reassurances offered that in a united Cyprus, GCs won't be subject to this kind of barbaric violence? Or were these killers held up as paragons of Turkish virtue, proclaimed heroes for defending the 'TRNC? The killer of Isaac, wanted by interpol, was in fact made a minister in the occupation administration and recently stood for 'election' for the pseudo-parliament. And then Turks have the audacity to accuse GCs of racism. What a funny world we live in.
MichaelA comments:
Cyprus Mail : Can you not let this story go? A couple of thugs attack a Nigerian. The thugs have been arrested. Why are you not happy with that? Because any incident , however small, is used as an excuse to tarnish and belittle Cyprus. How many column inches did this paper devote to Solomou when he was dragged to the ground and murdered? Do you care? Of course not. If he had been a Greek attacked or murdered, it will appear as a byline. The threat to democracy comes not from ELAM, but the tendentious rubbish that you publish day in day out.
John Alexander from London comments:
Yes, that's right, Loriot: the Cyprus problem has got nothing to do with 200,000 refugees, 180,00 settlers, 40,000 Turkish occupation troops, the forcible partition of the island and all the rest.
And I wonder what a 'mutual racist' is? Not heard that one before; there's always some new nonsense to glean from comments on the CM. And, who exactly, was going to exterminate the Turkish Cypriots, or was this just some paranoid delusion the TCs have come to believe in order to justify the ethnic cleansing of GCs and the partition of the island? In fact, you call me a racist while you justify and celebrate ethnic cleansing. Just another example of the perverse, Orwellian use of language the Turkish side is prone to – 'peace operation', 'exchange of populations', and all the rest.
The Original Peter from UK comments:
Our mutual racist JA says;
"That the Cyprus problem consists of Turkey's invasion and occupation of the island. Every thing else is just day-dreaming or hot air."
This event was of course the biggest problem amongst GC's but was the saviour of the TC's; one mans problem is anothers benefit.
The TC's don't hang the flags out every July for fun; to them it is
a celebration of the day the Turks came to save them from extinction.
I have spoken to many TC's in my travels and none of them will be prepared to forgo the Guaranteeship of Turkey in any agreement so if this is one of the prerequisites of the GC's the talks will go nowhere.
John Alexander from London comments:
And to answer expat observer's question directly? Of course, I want an end to the illegal occupation of the north; but I don't think this will come about through reconciliation between GCs and TCs, which is desirable, but meaningless until Turkey (like Britain did in Northern Ireland) declares it has no vital strategic interests in Cyprus and acts accordingly.
Loriot from Lapta comments:
"That the Cyprus problem consists of Turkey's invasion"
My god, John Alexander, how blockheaded can one be?
John Alexander from London comments:
Many of the comments here confirm my view that this emphasis on an utterly irrelevant organisation like ELAM is to denigrate and undermine legitimate expressions of resistance to the Turkish occupation, so that GCs will be obliged to accept Annan-type solutions.
But there's a deeper issue too; which is that those who bang on about ELAM believe that Greek nationalism is the root of the Cyprus problem and that the way to solve the Cyprus problem is for Cypriots – especially GCs, it seems – to renounce their ethnic identities and engage in reconciliation – mutual apologies and all the rest.
Except that the root of the Cyprus problem is not Greek nationalism or the breakdown in relations between TCs and GCs, who could apologise to each other till their blue in their face, and not one Turkish soldier or settler will leave the island and not one refugee will return to their homes; which reveals what? That the Cyprus problem consists of Turkey's invasion and occupation of the island. Every thing else is just day-dreaming or hot air.
Trendy from London, UK comments:
In response to Al from Planet Earth:
You are right, what the Grey Wolves and ELAM might want, if they can't exterminate the other side, is the creation of two states.
It would be patently wrong, however, to dismiss a solution framework from which the entire population stands to benefit simply because it is also favoured, as a second-best solution, by unsavoury extremist groups.
Formal, negotiated partition makes such extremist groups largely irrelevant in and of itself, i.e. without requiring a crackdown by officials. We all know how competent authorities are in both sides of Cyprus. Do we want a solution which requires them to do the right thing at all times in order to maintain peace and stability? Isn't it better to have an arrangement which works well under less than optimal conditions?
Let's also not forget that intercommunal fighting in Cyprus is not a monopoly of hardline extremists. Any kind of power-sharing arrangement is likely to be exploited by outside powers to weaken Cypriots politically so that the outsiders can further their own agenda. The certain losers in case there's an agreed, consensual two-state solution are foreign governments.
Andreas comments:
Great article.
I hope that you soon write about KISA and EDON who all support ILLEGAL immigrants and thus indirectly all the settlers in Cyprus. But I'm pretty we won't get such an article.
Loriot from Lapta comments:
'expatobserver' is correct with regard to the ethnic makeup of Cyprus. However, this is irrelevant anyway. If the world would have to be settled according to the homelands of ancient peoples we would see the greatest wave of migration ever seen, and there would be no American left.
What counts is the status quo and all political developments have to start from there, as has been the case throughout history. Very seldom, if ever, was the clock turned back.
The denial of this is the tragedy of the Greek Cypriots and very soon they have to pay the final price for it.
expatobserver comments:
Do people like John Alexender and the members of ELAM want an end to the illegal occupation of the North? If so I think they are going the wrong way about it since every hate filled message against the Turks gives the occupying forces all the justifification they think they need maintan a presence to protect thir people from the Likes of ELAM.
As CeNK of Famagusta comments, some what indelicately, The real Cypriots are more likley to have Levantine or Anatolian ancestors than any From what is now Greece. The Greekness of Greek Cypriots is relatively recent in terms of 10,000 years of Cypriot History. Rhe Acheans only came about 3000 yeas ago. I wonder if the indigeoneos Cypriots thought of them as invaders? Up to 2400 years so ago Cyprus had its own written language. The language probably became predominant beacuse of Cultural domination, just as the religeon was imposed by a Roman Emporer. As I understand it, most indigeonous Turkish Cypriots are descended from Cypriots who found it expedient in the 350 years or so of Turkish domination to speak Turkish and adopt Islam.
That is the whole pity of Cyprus, that rather than recognise the reality, and celebrate being Cypriot, (not Greek or Turkish) both cultures look to places that were most unlikey to be ancestral homelands.
EU protect the people comments:
So Will the Authorities Crack down on ELAM & GREY WOLVES ?
These mindless Thugs are a Stain on all Cypriots,
Al from Planet Earth comments:
In Response to Trendy;
Two states is exactly what ELAM and Grey Wolves want if they cannot get their way e.g. the extermination of either side.
However it is down to the GC Govt to punish ELAM ruthlessly and for the TC regime to do likewise with the Grey Wolves.
It would be wrong for a 2 state solution to be the final agreement as it would mean extremists would have won.
Gavin Jones comments:
Well said Shamrock from London and the Original Peter.
Everybody on both sides of the divide knows that the spiteful, hateful comments of 'the usual suspects' are an irrelevance...
The Original Peter comments:
John Alexander from London said:
"This is real mountain out of a molehill stuff… but with an ulterior motive, which is to assert that all expressions of patriotism and resistance to the Turkish occupation are somehow extremist ......."
So a gang beating up a black man is patriotic? A mob chasing after two Asians is patriotic? Damaging someones car is patriotic?
You really have crawled out of the woodwork now. If there are many more GC's like you there will NEVER be a settlement and there didn't ought to be. If thuggery against minorities is patriotic, Heaven help your banana republic!
And the Cratos is going to have Christofias as entertainer singing The Tender Trap!
Trendy from London, UK comments:
Yet another reason why I'm in favour of a settlement based on the foundation of two independent states with an internationally recognised border between them.
The ability of groups such as ELAM in the South or the Grey Wolves in the North to stoke intercommunal tensions is severely limited when, as is currently the case, there's a physical border between the two zones. Moreover, in the case of a formal, negotiated partition, their extremist views on whether Cyprus is purely "Turkish" or "Greek" would lose all relevance.
Same goes for Cypriot politicians, whose incompetence makes them just as dangerous as ELAM/Grey Wolves, however benevolent their intentions may be. Negotiated partition significantly limits the damage their incompetence can cause.
At the same time, a negotiated partition is the best guarantee for peaceful interaction between regular Cypriots. Just because there are two states doesn't mean people can't get together whenever they want, do business together, or travel anywhere they like on the island (or even live on the "other side", provided their side's politicians have no means of using them for political advantage)
Shamrock from london/nicosia comments:
@ Fevzi
your over-generalization is as dangerous as the tactics that elam members use to label all Turks as murderers, rapists etc. You imply that elam's behaviour is the norm amongst Greek Cypriots but you are simply turning a blind eye to the fact that a pro-reunification and pro-rapprochement government was elected by the majority; or the fact that when elam tried to march through the streets against illegal immigrants, their march was stopped by a larger anti-demonstration by antifascists and open-minded people (the journalist should have mentioned this I believe). You also claim that nothing alike exists in the north but I clearly remember a Greek Cypriot being beaten to death by members of the grey wolves in 1996 and they do still exist as organized groups in the north from what I hear from Turkish Cypriot friends who belong to the antifascist movement. It is exactly these type of people, extremists on both sides, that led to the 63 bi-communal clashes, the coup of 74 and the invasion. And these type of people today need to be contained and dealt with -not necessarily by democratic means, I am a firm believer of the notion that the enemies of freedom deserve no freedom themselves. Leaving emotional and moral reasons aside, partition would also not be beneficial on material terms: it would not be economically or politically stable and if you are interested I can email you political economy surveys and statistical models by non-Cypriot NGOs (in case you fear that a Cypriot one may be qualitatively or quantitatively biased). I agree with your statement "If the Greek Cypriots showed remorse, admitted their mistakes and the crimes they committed against the Turkish Cypriots between 1963-74, reconciliation might be possible and some sort of unification could be worked out" but I also turn it around towards Turkish Cypriots and Turks. We ALL need to acknowledge our mistakes and learn from them. I accept and I am ashamed of the criminal acts of extremists of the like of Eoka B' (who by the way had carried out atrocities against left-wing Greek Cypriots as well) and I do understand the way many Turkish Cypriots feel. Do YOU practice the self-criticism of which you speak about?
@ dave gurr
there is no place for any nazis in humanity, doesn't matter where they come from mate
@ hassan
everyone joins the army as it is mandatory, just like you do. Being courageous is not about shooting to kill, that's easy, especially in modern warfare where you don't have to experience the feelings of your blade slashing through flesh nor facing the eyes of the man you kill. Being courageous is to have the heart to forgive and the strength to accept and respect differences so you may live in peace. That's another lesson we must all learn.
@ joe
unfortunately some of them would attack in one-on-one situations, some of them we have faced numerous times in football related incidents. the good thing is, there is no man for whom another man exists who can defeat him ;) i like your rock-surrounded-by-water idea, perhaps we should do that and put there ultra-nationalists from both sides and let them take each other out, that way society gets rid of them and they get to die in the way they claim they are ready for :D
Europa comments:
So, we have Mussolini and Hitler lovers in Cyprus. Look what happened to them! Shouldn't ELAM stand for Education Lacking Among Morons?
Troodo comments:
It only takes a few hundred to bring back the killings.
Patientia est a donum superum
Fevzi from London & Kyrenia comments:
One more reason why we don't want unification with Greek South Cyprus while they have these criminal loonies beating up innocent, defenceless people in the streets.
And, what about their football hooligans. We have nothing like that in the North.
All that John Alexander is interested is the opening of the Cratos hotel. Good, John, you are contributing to the reconciliation of the two communities. Next week we'll give you Varosha back and next month all the refugees will return to their properties in Kyrenia, Morphou and Karpassia.
In your dreams. If the Greek Cypriots showed remorse, admitted their mistakes and the crimes they committed against the Turkish Cypriots between 1963-74, reconciliation might be possible and some sort of unification could be worked out. But their behaviour is far from this. I can see only one scenario for the settlement of the Cyprob - partition and two states.
Christoph from USA comments:
Journalists shouldn't be above criticism. The days when the mass media printed it's opinions and didn't have to take criticism from the public are over with. If I read an opinion I strongly disagree with I'm going to speak up in the comments section. I've done it on several occasions in the Cyprus Mail with some of the commentators who frankly needed to hear some alternative viewpoints. Those that dispense their opinions to the thousands need to hear back from those of us who disagree-that way they don't take themselves too seriously. Journalists make mistakes and publish faulty and sometimes unfair analysis. The reading public is here to keep you honest.
Joe Citizen from Limassol comments:
Free speech should not constitute open dissent and hate speech statements. Also, freedom of speech does not constitute freedom to dispense violence. The police must pursue criminal activity in the most vigorous manner because unprovoked attacks on people in the streets are just that, unacceptable criminal activities. On the political front, the more condemnation and public hammering they get from every quarter, the better. Lack of 'real' attention will dilute them eventually as they thrive on it like any other common bully. They are cowardly people with severe psycological problems that are unable to do things on their own. I'll bet not one of these nationalistic 'superheros' will attack an immigrant or anyone else on their own.
They must also be ridiculed at every turn and be reminded that they are neither unique or special and that every country has a little pocket of loonies. Maybe the UN can find a rock surrounded by water somewhere where all these ultras, skinheads, KK, et al can form their own looney weirdo dictatorship. Then again, who would they beat up? themselves maybe?