Our View: Without suffocating timeframes, the talks are free to go on forever

Published on February 7, 2010

LAST WEEK we had expressed the hope that, failing all else, the UN Secretary-General’s presence in Cyprus would at least help instill a sense of urgency in the very slow-moving peace process.

Although Ban Ki-moon received assurances from President Christofias that he would propose a framework for the continuation of the negotiations until the end of March, the latter made no commitment to more rounds of intensive talks like those held in January.

Ban left the island none the wiser about how Christofias wanted the talks to proceed, but at least he was given a very clear exposition of what the president objected to. He does not want any timeframes, arbitration or intensive talks while his spokesman made it very clear that our side does not want UN mediation either.

Presumably, the only role the president is prepared to recognise for Special Representative, Alexander Downer is as master of ceremonies; as for the rest of the UN team, they can take minutes, make photocopies and coffees and entertain the bodyguards of the two leaders.

In this way, Christofias and Talat can be assured of keeping the ownership of the process Cypriot and rule out the possibility of meddling foreigners trying to impose a foreign solution that does not serve the interests of all Cypriots – Greeks, Turks, Armenians, Maronites and Latins – plus 50,000 Turkish settlers.

Ban was won over to the idea and in his statement expressed his “personal support to the Cypriot-led and -owned process to reunify the island,” or whatever else the owners of the process might want to do with it. They are its owners they can do what they like with it – they could sell the film rights to Hollywood, if they so desired.

We Cypriots may have an unhealthy liking for litigation but we are also renowned for our tendency to sit together and resolve our differences in a reasonable and amicable way – as long as we are not being pressured by anyone.

If the international players and the UN had left the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots on their own, the Cyprus problem would have been solved many years ago in the just and fair way that has always eluded foreign mediators, out of touch with the realities on the island. Of course now, having started the negotiations from scratch, the two leaders will require a fair bit of time to put together a workable and viable settlement that respects all human rights, ensures the political equality of the two communities and does away with Turkish settlers and guarantees.

When in a few years’ time, the two leaders – assuming that Talat has not been replaced by the hawkish Dervis Eroglu in April – close the chapter on governance and power sharing in a mutually satisfactory way, they can then move on to the more difficult chapters such as property, territory and security.

Of course, there is the danger that Christofias might not be re-elected in 2013 and that his successor is from a party that wants to achieve a settlement without making any concessions to the Turks such as the rotating presidency.

We should not worry about such eventualities, as long as the process remains Cypriot-led and Cypriot-owned. Cypriot ownership of the talks will ensure against the rushed closure of the Cyprus problem which foreign countries, led by Britain, have been unsuccessfully plotting for more than 30 years now.

Thankfully, our politicians have always been alert to this danger and have thwarted the foreign plans to close the problem. Christofias is quite right in vehemently opposing artificial or suffocating timeframes for the conclusion of the talks, because he has a national obligation to keep the problem unsolved for future generations.

Cypriot ownership of the talks, approved by no lesser person than the UN Secretary-General, guarantees the continuation of the problem. And if Christofias’ critics, who never miss an opportunity to disparage his handling of the talks were fair, they would give him the credit he deserves for claiming ownership rights. They must have realised that, as the owners of the process, we now have the freedom to set the pace at which it will move and ignore Ban’s pleas for the talks “to go faster”.

Tue, February 23rd 2010 at 16:20

Mike from Australia comments:

Cyprus Conscious – you have said it so well. The Turks are typical, they expect to benefit from the best of both worlds. Well this has got to stop.

The Greenline needs to be closed immediately and only genuine Cypriots granted passports by the Republic of Cyprus. All pretend citizens of the Republic who in reality have shown their allegiance to Turkey and her puppet regime in the illegally occupied Northern Cyprus must be stripped of their passports and other citizenship documents.

Northern Cyprus quite rightly these days is a ghetto. If the people, who presently reside in the ghetto want to continue with their ghetto mentality so be it, let them, it is their choice. Let Turkey put her money where her mouth is.

Turkey’s EU membership application should be sent to where it belongs and that is the rubbish bin, it should be terminated forthwith. While even one Turkish soldier is located in Northern Cyprus, Ankara is in contravention of European Union policy. Ankara has been an applicant since 1959 and in contravention from the last 35 years. Surely after 35 years the EU powers can see that Turkey has no intention of complying with the EU rules so why waste anymore time. It is time for the EU to totally divorce itself from Turkey and while at it to also proceed with the formation of the European Union Treaty Organisation with all of the European Union members military personal to be transferred from NATO to the EUTO. NATO can then be brought to an end. It will serve to get rid of the Turk and America influence from the European Union decision making process.

Remember how America was not really interested in assisting the Allies in both the First and Second World Wars until American interests were bombed. America is a fine weather friend.

America spends too much time supporting Turkey. If America and Britain really wanted to atone for the sins that they committed in 1975 they could have done so along time ago. By now they could have forced Turkey out of Northern Cyprus. I thought that Britain had signed a guarantee to that effect in 1960. How easy it is for Britain to forget and renege.

Finally until Turkey demonstrates a will to comply with the rules of the EU there is no place for her in the EU, NATO or any other organisation in which EU members have an association. Turkey is a pariah and should be treated as such.

Thu, February 11th 2010 at 14:31

gibratsi from London UK comments:

Kyrie Theofanus

I have read your post and have one question for GCs who insist on Turkey 'recognising' the ROC.

Let's assume Turkey is brought to it's knees and is forced to 'recognise' the ROC.Would that not be tantamount to accepting by your goodself that there are TWO states on the island because Turkey already 'recognises' the TRNC.

Isn't that what you GCs ultimately want, the status quo to remain.Opinion polls amongst the GCs seem to suggest that anyway.

GCs ,please stop insulting my intelligence by pretending to want reunification?.Aghabide mou,Cyprus has been partitioned since 1963 and that's the way it's going to stay.

Wed, February 10th 2010 at 20:04

Harry Theofanus from USA comments:

Comments to UNSG Ban Ki-moon Statements on visit to Cyprus

We that advocate for a just and workable solution based on UN adopted Resolutions and the high level agreements of 1977-79 and 2006-08, heard and read the statements of the UNSG on His trip to Cyprus. According to the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon He went to Cyprus to encourage the two leaders of the Cypriot communities to reach a mutually-acceptable solution to the Cyprus problem, an effort that requires “courage, flexibility and vision as well as a spirit of compromise”.

The UNSG stressed quite clearly that: “the process of the talks belongs to Cyprus and that HE is there at the invitation of both sides to ASSIST THE TALKS. They have taken responsibility for finding a solution. They are the ones driving the process and the ones who will benefit from tremendous benefits and opportunities a settlement will bring to this island”. Also the Secretary General added, “The expectations of the international community are very high. And that the UN does not underestimate the importance of a solution not only to Cyprus but also to the region and indeed to the world. Solving the Cyprus problem will give an inspiration to all those around the world trying to solve other seemingly intractable conflicts.

Mr. UNSG Ban Ki-moon, we do believe that the Cyprus problem is not easy to solve mainly under the present conditions and difficulties that the two leaders and the Cypriot legal Citizens of a country a full member of the UN and the EU face. At the same time, We are confident that a solution to this political problem of a UN member country can be possible if You and Your REFEREES (advisors) use as bases the UN Charter rules and implement adopted resolutions that will improve and give the correct conditions for the CYPRIOT POLITICAL WILL needed and the UN SECURITY essential during the talks and during the referendums that have to take place to finalize the agreement. We furthermore believe that the biggest BENEFICIARY of a just and lasting Cyprus solution will be ABOVE ALL the UN and its improved image that will be apple to help other countries to solve their similar problems proper.

Mr. Secretary General do you really feel that courage, flexibility and vision as well as a spirit of compromise by the two community leaders can solve the Cyprus reunification problem without your making sure as the Referee of this political dispute that the conditions for the talks are fair, playable, without outside interferences and the players that will take place in the referendum voting to finalize the results are all legal according to the Republic of Cyprus the full member country of the UN?

We that follow Cyprus from the 1950’s when the UN did not accept Cyprus’s request for self-determination then as a British colony, know of a number of outside interferences that will prevent a just, lasting and workable reunification solution to these talks. Here are some of the main ones:
a) Turkey does not recognize the Republic of Cyprus and is the only country that recognizes the illegal TRNC illegal according to UN resolutions 549 & 550.

b) Turkey voted for the unanimous resolution GA3212 that was also adopted by the Security Council but it does not implement it.
c) Turkey is occupying 37% of the Republic and assists Turkish illegal settlers to enter the occupied area with the illegal to outnumber the legal Turkish-Cypriots now.
d) Turkey says that she supports the “by the Cypriots for the Cypriots talks” but in fact it dictates them.
e) Cyprus as a full member of the UN and EU does not need guarantor powers.

Finally Mr. UNSG, if you allow “Turkish logic” that is based on expansion policies using the Turkish military power to act as an outside interference to the talks the results can be catastrophic not only for the reunification of Cyprus by also for other countries of the UN with minorities asking for statehoods or independence, with the biggest looser been the UN. YOU as the Secretary General must Practice Justice based on the UN CHARTER and using as a tool the implementation of UN adopted resolutions.

Harry Theofanus Human Rights Advocate and Past President of the CFA and PSEKA

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 15:09

gibratsi from London UK comments:

YAWN-----YAWN-----YAWN

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 14:23

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Kurds are a large proud ethnic minority in Turkey.
Turkish Cypriots are a large proud ethnic minority in Cyprus.

SOLUTIONS TO THESE PROBLEMS WILL BE IDENTICAL AT THE END OF THE DAY.
'
The TC problem exists since 1963.
The Kurdish problem exists since 1923.
'
ZAMAN Feb 8th 2010 - The root causes of Turkey’s Kurdish challenge
""
...
It is clear that in today’s Turkey there is a gap between the expectations of Kurds, in terms of their political, cultural and economic aspirations, and the realities on the ground. This is clearly relevant for the conditions of today: In the aftermath of the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) democratic opening, the expectations of the Kurdish citizens were significantly raised. Yet, at the end of the day, when the Democratic Society Party (DTP) was banned and many Kurdish officials were arrested, the actual events on the ground created a huge gap between the reality and Kurdish expectations. In that sense, the absence of constitutional liberties brings a “political” dimension to relative deprivation. In other words, there is a growing gap between Kurdish political and cultural aspirations and realities of the Turkish political system. Bridging this gap between reality and expectation is crucial if Turkey is to peacefully solve its Kurdish problem and tackle the root causes of terrorism more rationally. Yes, socio-economic problems matter. The growing number of unemployed Kurdish youth is particularly alarming. But repressive political systems exacerbate the challenge. This is why the Kemalist establishment -- from the military to the judiciary -- should do their best to support the democratic opening instead of trying to find ways to stifle it. Only then can the Kurds put a distance between themselves and terrorism.
""

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 14:11

gibratsi from London UK comments:

Antifon
You are wasting your breath , do us all a favour and find a more appropriate platform for your posts.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 13:31

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

It is still mine to "waste".
'
Kurds are a large proud ethnic minority in Turkey. TCs are a large proud ethnic minority in Cyprus. SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS WILL BE IDENTICAL AT THE END OF THE DAY. BELIEVE ME.
'
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/columnists-200985-the-root-causes-of-t...
'
ZAMAN Feb 8th 2010 - The root causes of Turkey’s Kurdish challenge
""
...
It is clear that in today’s Turkey there is a gap between the expectations of Kurds, in terms of their political, cultural and economic aspirations, and the realities on the ground. This is clearly relevant for the conditions of today: In the aftermath of the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) democratic opening, the expectations of the Kurdish citizens were significantly raised. Yet, at the end of the day, when the Democratic Society Party (DTP) was banned and many Kurdish officials were arrested, the actual events on the ground created a huge gap between the reality and Kurdish expectations. In that sense, the absence of constitutional liberties brings a “political” dimension to relative deprivation. In other words, there is a growing gap between Kurdish political and cultural aspirations and realities of the Turkish political system. Bridging this gap between reality and expectation is crucial if Turkey is to peacefully solve its Kurdish problem and tackle the root causes of terrorism more rationally. Yes, socio-economic problems matter. The growing number of unemployed Kurdish youth is particularly alarming. But repressive political systems exacerbate the challenge. This is why the Kemalist establishment -- from the military to the judiciary -- should do their best to support the democratic opening instead of trying to find ways to stifle it. Only then can the Kurds put a distance between themselves and terrorism.
""

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 13:08

gibratsi from London UK comments:

Antifon you are wasting your breath , do us all a favour and find a more appropriate platform for your posts.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 11:17

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Gentlemen, you may not like me pointing out the parallels but please read below as we will soon be watching history in the making, a replay of sorts of Cyprus early 1960s in Turkey itself. Replace Kurd with TC and Turk with GC. The only thing that is missing from the equation, thus it takes a lot longer in Turkey for developments to unfold, is an outside fascist government co-ruled by a strong military in support of the minority, using it as a pretext to promote own goals.
'
I expect the medicine to be as bitter as it has been for the Cypriot people. Good luck!
'
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-201018-ngos-call-for-calm-amid-pr...
'
I want to vote for a TC President who will be Cypriot first. Are there any genuine Turkish Cypriots left in Cyprus? If so, you should sympathize with the struggle of the Kurds, both the peaceful as well as the militant ones. Their struggle is genuine and just!

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 11:03

Hasan Kemal from UK/Kyrenia comments:

Diavolos,

You can't be Greek, Greeks are civilized.

You must have Turkish in you.

Even Makarios's grandfather was called Yusuf Mouskos.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 10:44

Alexy Flemming from NORTH CYPRUS comments:

THERE IS NO UNIFICATION IN THE WORLD! THERE IS ONLY SEPARATION IN THE WORLD: SINCE 1990, 33 NEW COUNTRIES EXISTED BY

THE SEPARATION OF FEDERATIONS, CONFEDERATIONS, COUNTRIES (EVEN THE SAME RACED, SAME RELIGIONED, SAME LANGUAGED

SERBIA-MONTENEGRO!)

YUGOSLAVIA = 16 Bosnia and Herzegovina + 17 Croatia + 18 Macedonia + 19 Serbia and Montenegro + 20 Slovenia

21 Namibia (South Africa)
22 Marshall Islands, 23 Micronesia (Caroline Islands) 24 Palau (USA)

Czechoslovakia = 25 Czech Republic + 26 Slovakia

27 Eritrea (Ethiopia)
28 East Timor (Timor-Leste) (Indonesia)
Serbia-Montenegro = 29 Montenegro + 30 Serbia
31 Kosovo (Serbia).
Georgia = 32 Gerorgia + 33 Abhasia + 34 South Ossetia AND GOES ON....

INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN AND PARTIALLY RECOGNIZED NORTH (TURKISH) CYPRUS WILL BE INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED WITHOUT

COMPROMISE JUST AS THE ABOVE 34 NEW COUNTRIES.

We (Turkish Cypriots) hate Greek Cypriots, You (Greek Cypriots) hate us (Turkish Cypriots).
If Greek Cyprus does NOT recognize Turkish Cyprus, We (Turkish Cyprus) will NOT give WATER to Greek Cyprus EVEN IF

GREEK CYPRUS PAY THE PRICE OF WATER!!!

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 10:43

Alexy Flemming from NORTH CYPRUS comments:

THERE IS NO UNIFICATION IN THE WORLD! THERE IS ONLY SEPARATION IN THE WORLD: SINCE 1990, 33 NEW COUNTRIES EXISTED BY

THE SEPARATION OF FEDERATIONS, CONFEDERATIONS, COUNTRIES (EVEN THE SAME RACED, SAME RELIGIONED, SAME LANGUAGED

SERBIA-MONTENEGRO!)

Latvia + 9 Lithuania + 10 Moldova + 11 Russia + 12 Tajikistan + 13 Turkmenistan + 14 Ukraine + 15 Uzbekistan

YUGOSLAVIA = 16 Bosnia and Herzegovina + 17 Croatia + 18 Macedonia + 19 Serbia and Montenegro + 20 Slovenia

21 Namibia (South Africa)
22 Marshall Islands, 23 Micronesia (Caroline Islands) 24 Palau (USA)

Czechoslovakia = 25 Czech Republic + 26 Slovakia

27 Eritrea (Ethiopia)
28 East Timor (Timor-Leste) (Indonesia)
Serbia-Montenegro = 29 Montenegro + 30 Serbia
31 Kosovo (Serbia).
Georgia = 32 Gerorgia + 33 Abhasia + 34 South Ossetia AND GOES ON....

INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN AND PARTIALLY RECOGNIZED NORTH (TURKISH) CYPRUS WILL BE INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED WITHOUT

COMPROMISE JUST AS THE ABOVE 34 NEW COUNTRIES.

We (Turkish Cypriots) hate Greek Cypriots, You (Greek Cypriots) hate us (Turkish Cypriots).
If Greek Cyprus does NOT recognize Turkish Cyprus, We (Turkish Cyprus) will NOT give WATER to Greek Cyprus EVEN IF

GREEK CYPRUS PAY THE PRICE OF WATER!!!

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 09:52

Cyprus Conscious comments:

Comments made by people like DIAVOLOS or EMIR SOLER, proves my point that even though there is a very slim possibility in finding solution, HOW DO WE EXPECT TO MAINTAIN IT?

WE DO NOT DESERVE TO HAVE A COUNTRY IF OUR PEOPLE HAVE THESE BELIEVES......ESPECIALLY BEING AN EU country.

We are a lost case...........

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 09:04

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Guys, you may not like me pointing out the parallels but please read below as we will soon be watching history in the making, a replay of sorts of Cyprus early 1960s in Turkey itself. Replace Kurd with TC and Turk with GC. The only thing that is missing from the equation, thus it takes a lot longer in Turkey for developments to unfold, is an outside fascist government co-ruled by a strong military in support of the minority, using it as a pretext to promote own goals.
'
I expect the medicine to be as bitter as it has been for the Cypriot people. Good luck!
'
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-201018-ngos-call-for-calm-amid-pr...
'
I want to vote for a TC President who will be Cypriot first. Are there any genuine Turkish Cypriots left in Cyprus? If so, you should sympathize with the struggle of the Kurds, both the peaceful as well as the militant ones. Their struggle is genuine and just!

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 08:49

Cyprus Conscious comments:

Emir Soler......as always, it is YOU that lives on a la la land or rather on a Banana republic.

Since you want to think that you have a country and its name is trnc (aka Banana republic of trnc), you have no choice other than to be close to Turkey. After all 200 countries are idiots no to recognize your Banana and since in Turkey's wisdom, trnc exist.

You are trapted in the la la land and you may have today choice (still) but in few years, you may have no choice. You can become Turkish citizen and you can have all the rights associated with. After all 20 million Kurds are proud to be Turkish, why on earther 88,000 TCs won't be proud.

PS. Especially Emir Soler type of people, we prefer them to stay with Turkey. WE DO NOT WANT YOU, ANYWAY.........

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 08:40

Cyprus Conscious comments:

Lets return to the title of this article, as we have side track a bit on this one.......will the talks run for ever?

There was a new SERIOUS development last night.......that is 1 out of the 3 coalition parties withdraw from the government. That's now only AKEL and DHKO in the government, with DHKO having meetings today (to decide finally in 1 week time), to decide if to say goodbye to Christofias government.

If DHKO pulls out of the government, as you may understand, the government will be only AKEL. If Christofias will have any dignity, he will have to resign. We might have a Presidential system, and Christofias may opt to continue, but definitely his view and his proposals on the Cyprus negotiation will not reflect/represent the will of the Greek Cypriots.

On the other hand, TC election on April, will show whether they support Talat handling of the negotiation or decide that better have Eroglu so NO SOLUTION from TCs based on Talat handling.

Even though, I suspect DHKO will remain in the government, only for one reason. The true reason is the benefit of being in power and the gifts associated with. DHKO will get more priviledges with Socialist EDEK out of the government. DHKO will 'justify' the decision of staying, by saying that it is better to stay in order to 'control' Christofias and that now they have agreed on a NEW LINES with Christofias (this is the 'story' that Karoyian will have to 'serve' to DHKO supporters to convince them about their decision!).

With all this uncertainly in mind, THE TALKS WILL GO ON FOR EVER AS NO ONE WILL EVER HAVE THE GUTS TO SIGN ANY AGREEMENT ON SOLVING THE CYPRUS PROBLEM WITH THE TYPE OF SOLUTION THAT ARE NEGOTIATING.

We have been living for so many years apart. Even though, there is a small chance in finding a solution, THERE IS NO WAY TO MAINTAIN IT. We have lived too many years apart, and we have too many settlers even to create worst problems.

Lets face it, negotiations will continue for ever, the Christofias government today is weaker (if DHKO opt out of the government, then we won't have RoC people supporting Christofias from now on), and Eroglu may come to power.

We have been FORCIBLY GIVEN a CONSTRITUTION in 1960 (the PEOPLE of CYPRUS, NEVER voted for our Constitution!). In order to Unite the island, we need a REVOLUTION from both sides. Are we willing to start the REVOLUTION? and say to everybody LEAVE US ALONE as we want to decide for our future?

I DO NOT THINK SO.........WE ARE TOO MUCH DEPENDANT OF THE PAST and especially TCs have been affected too much of the PROPAGANDA that a considerable majority believe that are in a danger from GCs and the only way to be protected is to have occupation army. And, this is NOT accepted by the GCs as we want a truly independent country.

SUMMARY: By April, lets stop this no-go negotiations that lead us nowhere. Lets veto Turkey's entrance in EU. No negotiation again with Turkey, unless Turkey pulls out its occupation army and immediately return Varoshia to start with. Let's close the 'boarders' of the Green Line til we decide if we want to live together. Revoke all the passports of RoC from those who do not believe in RoC. And, if GCs and TCs want to live together then they will have to revolt and vote for Cyprus Constitution based on EU principles.

Stop this nonses of bizonnal solution and finding stupid and artificial nazi ways of sharing power. Let the TCs live in peace and secure their fears and at the same time, respect HUMAN RIGHTS.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 07:57

Emir Soler from TRNC comments:

Mike, are you asking Turkish Cypriots to abundant Turkey and join up with RoC?
How naïve you are. That shows you are living in the la la land.
What has RoC done to help Turkish Cypriots last 36 years?
RoC Done NOTHING, part from AMBARGO.
Turkey supported TRNC for last 36 years, and will carry on supporting it years to come.
Cyprus is 38 miles from shores of Turkey. Do you really believe, Turkey will allow, Cyprus to become another Greek Island in Mediterranean? Never in million years.
Your hopes are dashed, when EU, UN and USA decided to do nothing about Cyprus.
Greek propaganda doesn’t work anymore. Look at Greece, cooking the books to get in to EU.
Cyprus will follow very soon.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 07:36

Mike from Australia comments:

You can forget all about a Turkish State on Cyprus with international powers, that is only a pipe dream promoted by a few who have a self interest in promoting things as they are currently.

Whilst these people relax in their glory and majority of the Cypriot Turks continue to suffer.

Until such time as the Cypriot Turks rise and speak for them selves they may as well stay down in the swamp where they belong.

If the Cypriot Turks are going to allow Ankara to continue to speak for them well they may as well go the same way as Turkey and that is remain out side of the European Union.

I find it hard to understand as to how the Cypriot Turks who are so anti the legitimate government of Cyprus are allowed to go to the south to benefit from the facilities and in the case of some European Union membership.

The solution is quite simple, if they want to be their own state independent of the south then the greeline crossings should be closed forthwith enforcing them to become totally reliant on Ankara. Why should the EU and the legitimate government of Cyprus subsidise the North. The Northern Turks are receiving all of the benefits and have the cheek to complain. After all it is a fact that Turkey is in fact unlawfully occupying Northern Cyprus, the territory of a sovereign country.

It is no different to Saddam Hussein sitting on Kuwait or Argentina on the Falkland Islands in both cases they were repelled by the Americans and the British. Yet in the case of Northern Cyprus both the Americans and the British are up to their usual treacherous activities, they are collaborating with Ankara.

Both the Americans and the British encouraged Turkey to invade in 1974 and in the last 35 years they have condoned Turkey’s occupations of Northern Cyprus. It is time for Cyprus to rid itself of everything British starting with the two military bases. Cyprus should follow Malta’s lead, the British tried every dirty trick in the book in the hope of keeping facilities in Malta.

Turkey has demonstrated without a doubt that she can’t be trusted. A further demonstration has occurred in recent times with the Moslem leaning government of Turkey fraternising with European Union enemy states the likes of Iran. We have also seen Turkey turn against Israel. It is time that the EU member states moved their armed forces from NATO to a new European Union Treaty Organisation (EUTO). Only European States would be permitted to participate thus Turkey and her American backers would be denied membership. Unfortunately far too often the Americans side with Turkey at the expense of the likes of Cyprus and other European Union member states. One day the Americans may wake up to the fact that the Turks and their fellow Muslims cannot be trusted.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 06:49

Christoph from USA comments:

Fevzi from London, any viable settlement will NOT be a federation of two 'states', it will be a Federal nation of two constituent provinces-the parts of which will NOT have sovereign powers. Turks want to assure their province will have sovereign authority, but it will not. Neither the UN or the EU supports that. Turkey's 35 year effort to upgrade TRNC to a seperate state has not been accepted by the world community, it's a failure.

Tue, February 9th 2010 at 04:25

wissy from earth comments:

IT is not the fault of the Greek Cypriot at all the fault is actually from EU. I am so sure if EU himself never let the Greek or south Cyprus to join the community. and ask them to solve this problem first and after it has been solved they should live happily together for at least 5 years. then everything will be fine they both we want this benefit from EU. this should have been the best or good option but EU was selfish. anyway lots to say about this i am a foreigner, its not the fault of the Greek Cypriot. now because of EU benefit and international recognition the Turk or north Cypriot are begging for negotiations .

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 23:17

Fevzi from London & Kyrenia comments:

Antifon: Your reasoning is really funny, soon you will say milk is black. "As for partition, it will not happen". Partition HAS happened, that's what you got now. And if the present talks succeed, you will have a federation made up of two constituent states, a kind of partition, if they don't succeed, the present partition will become permanent.
Contrary to what you say, the majority of GCs want partition as they don't want to share governance with the TCs.
It is not up to China, Russia or France to decide what happens in Cyprus, if they had the power, why didn't they do anything in the last 36 years. Ok, the UN passed some stupid resolutions which are in the waste-paper bin and Turkey is now in the Security Council.
As for Kyrenia, it was mainly Greek but now it is all Turkish, and in a solution, it will still be Turkish but you will get TC owned land left in the South in exchange and/or compensation.
So, stop dreaming.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 23:17

Fevzi from London & Kyrenia comments:

Antifon: Your reasoning is really funny, soon you will say milk is black. "As for partition, it will not happen". Partition HAS happened, that's what you got now. And if the present talks succeed, you will have a federation made up of two constituent states, a kind of partition, if they don't succeed, the present partition will become permanent.
Contrary to what you say, the majority of GCs want partition as they don't want to share governance with the TCs.
It is not up to China, Russia or France to decide what happens in Cyprus, if they had the power, why didn't they do anything in the last 36 years. Ok, the UN passed some stupid resolutions which are in the waste-paper bin and Turkey is now in the Security Council.
As for Kyrenia, it was mainly Greek but now it is all Turkish, and in a solution, it will still be Turkish but you will get TC owned land left in the South in exchange and/or compensation.
So, stop dreaming.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 19:34

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

5% of Turkey's population is 3.6 million people. According to you 3.6 million people in Turkey openly support violence to topple the status quo. I am willing to be that another 20%, if given a choice in a referendum, would vote for representation rights for the Kurdish minority similar to the ones that the 1963 solution provides for the Turkish Cypriots. I remind you that it was less than 5% of Turkish Cypriots (or 1% of total population) that instigated the problems between the GCs and TCs in the 1950s and 60s.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 19:28

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Thank you both for the diagnosis.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 19:12

Emir Soler from London UK comments:

'
Antifon, you are very stressed out, your days are numbered, relax man, you will die of a heart attack, before to long. I will take care of your old house in Girne.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 19:00

TrueFacts from Turkiye comments:

Antifon, if you had a brain you would have been very dangereous.
'
1-EU based on equel power sharing which you are part of it.
'
2-Kurds - 80% voted for main stream parties which reflect the level of integration of Kurds into Turkish Society, the radicals supporting terror amount to just 5% of Turkey’s population, Turkey is now fulfilling its obligations to award everyone its cultural rights.
'
Now, Antifon and Christoph, go and tell those stories to some school kids . JACANORY

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 18:46

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

I would think twice before invoking the UN. Before the UN laid down its latest ideas it voted numerous resolutions. Let us take them in order, shall we?
'
It is not correct to compare the EU with the Cyprus Republic. The EU is a loose confederation. If it wasn't, for example, the solution to Greece's finances would have been easily resolved. It is either childish or ignorant to compare the two, as an apple is simply not an orange.
'
As far as partition, it will not happen. The vast majority of Cypriots, the simpletons I refer to, oppose it. The international community opposes it (China, Russia, France, etc). The Cypriots must first want it, and they don't. They never will. Because Keryneia is 88% Greek. And that cannot change. Not in the last 36 years. Not in another 36. You owe me more with every day that passes and you refuse to see the truth. That is more your problem than mine. And I honestly do not wish you to have such a problem.
'
Turkey's problems are fundamental. I will not even try to convince you of that cause we will disagree on what fundamentals for a democracy are.
'
The correct answers to the questions are:
- 86 is not equal to 14 in Cyprus. No system can make it so.
- 77 is not equal to 23 in Turkey. No system can make it so.
'
Read the 1963 solution if you are a deserving Cypriot. It is also a good base for the Turkish problem. Turkey needs our help. Or it soon will.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 18:28

Fevzi from London & Kyrenia comments:

Antifon: "The federated solution will soon be scrapped for Cyprus". That's what I predict as well. But, what will be the result? A unitary Cyprus with GCs in charge? Of course NOT. It will be partition, as it is now.
To your question 'How can 18% be equal to 82%? The answer to your question is the same way as 3/4 million Cyprus is equal to 80 million Germany in the EU. Do you understand that? All member states in the EU have the same veto power as any other, however big or small.
As for Cyprus, the UN has laid down the principles for a solution and one of them is that both communities will have political equality. If you don't like it, fair enough, there won't be a settlement and everyone will stay in their home and live separately, meaning PARTITION, which is what we wanted all along.
As for your prediction that the Republic of Turkey will not reach its 90th birthday in peace...don't worry about Turkey. Turkey is getting stronger in the region all the time. Worry about your motherland. Greece is now bankrupt and a 'protectorate' of the EU. They will be taking orders from the Germans, they will have to slash welfare payments, pensions, put up taxes, there will be riots in the streets. It is no use borrowing billions from foreigners each month to live above your means, one day it catches up with you, as it has now done with Greece. Greek ministers will have to borrow the bus fare to go to Brussells meetings. They are also being taken to court by the EU for false accounting, for telling lies about their economy, their statistics. The RoC is going the same way, with double the deficit allowed for being in the euro. So, it's not all roses on your side either.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 16:52

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

I wonder if Turkey (the Turkish ruling majority via its Islamic and TSK elites) would accept a similar solution to its Kurdish/ constitutional problem:
'
http://www.cyprus.gov.cy/moi/pio/pio.nsf/5716992f751f2acfc2257076004d029...
'
The federated solution will soon be scrapped for Cyprus. For one simplistic reason really: Cypriots in their naïveté will not manage to understand how 18 can be made to equal 82 (or 14 to equal 86). These same simpletons are also not capable of understanding that if 18 must equal 82 then why not 23 to equal 77 in Turkey.
'
Muster the strength to read above solution. It is part of our history. Hopefully, part of our future too. If you are fair, sincere, a pragmatist and a TRUE CYPRIOT then seek no longer. Simply adjust to EU Cyprus of 2010 and we can enter year 51 united. For the good of Cypriots, Turkey, Greece and the region.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 16:22

Troodo comments:

Christoph from USA.

That's all we need is some moron from America calling everyone else a birdbrain.

Instead of lecturing others on 'da facts' why don't you spend some significant time polishing up the bruised and battered American'image' overseas?

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 14:02

Christoph from USA comments:

A brit lecturing others on Ethics. LOL. EE-what a moron.

You dressing up in nun's clothing during this weeks drinking binge, EE???? Another proud moment in British expatriate history!

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 13:53

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Fair must be both ways. Fair to the 18% and fair to the 82%.
'
Same in Turkey: equality for the close to 25% Kurdish population means neither separation nor 50-50 power sharing. Else it would be unfair to the 75% Turkish majority.
'
A correction: TCs actually make up today less than 14% of total Cypriot population.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 13:29

Ahmet from Cyprus comments:

To Antifon

You keep asking the same question which is "should an 18% minority impose its will on an 82% majority?"
The answer is - its not about imposing our will but get equal and fair treatment from the majority.
In any case this is fast becoming an irrelevant. The ratio is no longer 18:82. Its more like 40:60. In another 10 years it will be 50:50. In twenty years the turkish cypriots will be a majority. Does that answer your question.
My question now is will you now bugger off and let real Cypriots add their opinion on this site rather than constantly adding endless rubbish about the kurds.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 11:18

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Do I detect a bit of fascism in you too?
'
In my modest opinion whether there will be peace in Turkey is most relevant to the Cyprus issue. You disagree?
'
Or answer me this question: should an 18% minority impose its will on an 82% majority? Or a 25% minority on a 75% majority?

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 10:05

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Never mind the negotiations on Cyprus. A bigger, significantly defining, question is: will Turkey live to celebrate its 90th birthday in peace?
'
One of the byproducts of Turkish EU aspirations has been that the fascism in Turkish foreign policy, the fascism in Turkey's approach towards its own large ethnic minority of the Kurds, the fascism in its military inspired/drafted 1982 constitution and the hypocrisy of the fascist ruling regime vis-a-vis Cyprus have become all too apparent to the core Europeans. The Europeans have confirmed beyond reasonable doubt what they suspected all along: Turkey of 2010 is light years away from a European mentality and many people suffer directly or indirectly, including the Turks themselves, as a result.
'
For my part I want to say: may your revolution be peaceful. I am afraid however that velvet a Turkish revolution by definition cannot be.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 09:54

James JH Lockhart from Emba paphos comments:

Christoph Check www.cyprus-property-action-group.com in Particular updates and case histories, in updates you see how the land registry in Paphos are now Working out how much The TERRIBLE BRITS should pay IPT and Then See how the Interior misinister does Not reply

So greek cypriots think EU Courts Will Help them, But Ignore What they are Doing in the South. As to your comments on Brits,

Just look where your Economy Going, In the End Any person cypriot greek, Turk, brit Etc, With Any Sense Will be long gone from Cyprus, That what will happen unless common Sense and justice kicks in.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 04:32

EE from dose it matter? comments:

Antifon and Christoph from USA
Please read below from arcives Cyprus mail 19 March 2006.
I think you two bird brains should resurch little more before considering on EU Courts. They already had enought of Greek Cypriot problems. I like to know what will hapen when Turks start courts action agains Greek Goverment...
Vince from London
It's always interesting to hear pontificating from Greek Cypriots about a) how squeaky clean they are when it comes to handling refugee's property and b) how everyone wants to return to the situation pre-1974.
The attached article taken from the (South Cyprus) Sunday Mail, 19th March 2006, suggest they may have some interesting issues to resolve should we ever approach any sort of settlement!
"WE HAVE been shouting and protesting for 30 years because the Turkish Cypriots have been building on our property. But the legitimate government (of Cyprus) gave us money to build houses on the properties of the Turkish Cypriots. And at the time they lied to us, telling us that they had given us state land. This was what was written on the documents we signed."
I retained these words, uttered by a frustrated citizen in a television news story about a noisy protest held last Tuesday in Polemidia by hundreds of displaced persons who had built houses on plots given to them by the Spyros Kyprianou government some 30 years ago.
In the same report, a woman, who was visibly angry, said: "We were fooled. They brought us here, gave us land belonging to the Turkish Cypriots and, through a life of hard toil, we built our houses on it, married, brought up our children and now they are telling us to leave and that they will give us a plot somewhere else. In other words, we have to start from the beginning again. We will never leave. We will stay here and if they dare, they can come and kick us out."
Similar sentiments were expressed by several other protesters. I consider the words of these people very important because they expose, in the most damning way, the absurdity of the policy we followed in the post-1974 years. The policy was centred on the nefarious slogan, ‘All refugees will return to their homes’.
I will not refer to the hypocrisy of the parties in government, which, in view of the elections, are now proceeding with the issuing of title deeds for houses to thousands of refugees. These very same parties lambasted the former president Glafcos Clerides, accusing him of treachery, when, seven or eight years ago, he decided to issue title deeds. I had questioned the wisdom of this move at the time, predicting that one of the consequences would be to create resentment among all refugees who had built houses on Turkish Cypriot land; Tuesday’s protest in Polemidia proved the point. During the Clerides presidency the patriots of AKEL, EDEK and DIKO accused the government of issuing ‘title deeds’ because it had surrendered the right of the refugees to return to their own homes.
The slogan about the "right of all refugees to return to their homes", with which politicians have been bombarding us for more than 30 years is a myth that has now collapsed, as the words of the refugees mentioned above show. It is blatantly obvious that today, 32 years after the displacement of large sections of the population, almost none of the refugees want to return to their home – I refer to the areas that would be under Turkish Cypriot control in the event of a federal settlement.

Vince from London comments:
I'm presuming that Ms Papadopoulos does not support the idea of a negotiated settlement to the Cyprus Problem. Because if she thinks that this sort of article can help the current peace process in any way then she is sadly mistaken. What it does is fuel a totally unrealistic expectation amongst Greek Cypriots that they will be able to wind the clock back 35 years as a result of a questionable legal decision, whilst further brow-beating an already oppressed Turkish Cypriot community. It is these two communities that will need to vote on any proposed solution should it emerge from the current discussions. And simplistic, one-sided articles like this just serve to widen the gap between the two halves.
She's very good at gloating and criticising Turkey but as a politician it would be more appropriate to hear what HER suggestions are to resolve the Cyprus Problem.

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 01:12

Christoph from USA comments:

EU Courts will start settling Greek Cypriot property 'damages' against Turkey in the coming year. The cases could well amount to Billions of EUROS. We'll see how long the Turks stay on Cyprus when they're paying Millions of EUROS in settlements every month to Greek Cypriots. LOL

Mon, February 8th 2010 at 00:11

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

Sounds logical. Is it?
'
Will Turks also agree to share power with Kurds? Will the Kurds demand it? How far are they willing to go? Should power sharing in Turkey be on a 50-50 basis? How similar should the settlement of the Cyprus problem be to that of the Turkish problem?
'
All extremely interesting questions.
'
The world has had enough of Turkish fascistic "logic". The Kurds too. Watch for developments that will rock your world. Funnily enough, they will be positive for the Turkish, Kurdish and Cypriot nations.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 22:22

Fevzi from London & Kyrenia comments:

ANTIFON: Why are you so naive about Turkey withdrawing her troops from the island? Do you thing they can just pack up and go? What order will they leave behind when they go? Obviously, there must be a settlement first. Turkey will withdraw her troops when an agreement is reached between the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. And it looks the GCs do not want to share power with the TCs and are dragging their feet in the talks. So, Turkish troops will stay. The more time passes, the harder it will be for a settlement. More people will settle on GC land in the North and it will be unfair to dislodge them. More children will be born to Turkish nationals thereby claiming citizenship rights, so the population in the North will grow. In the end, they will just pay compensation to the GCs for loss of land and keep it all. And, have permanent partition.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 20:59

Antifon from the World Wide Web comments:

OK
'
A very large percentage of Kurds feel the injustice in their hearts and are quiet supporters of any step in the right direction: COMMUNITY AND HUMAN RIGHST for the Kurds of Turkey, not unlike the rights that the Turkish fascist regime has been advocating for another nation's minority, the Turkish Cypriots of the Cyprus Republic.
'
Support for a united country with safeguards on all issues close to the heart of the minority will be the solution for large ethnic minorities in Turkey and Cyprus.
'
The solution of Turkey's Kurdish problem lays in Cyprus. And the solution of the Cyprus issue lays somewhere in Kurdistan.
'
As far as Cypriot ownership of the process, that can only start to happen when Turkey be a good girl and withdraw its troops from Cyprus.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 17:56

gibratsi from London UK comments:

Antifon,as Mary Atkins says stick to the Cyprus issue and take your Kurdish issue to a more appropriate forum.Yes, we all feel for you but please do not bombard us with irrelevant subjects which have nothing to do with Cyprus.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 16:18

Peter Leonidas from uk comments:

Sir
I find it hard to believe that the talks can be called Cypriot owned when so many outside powers are influencing the outcome.
Turkey has made it known that there are lines in the sand that can not be crossed and I would suspect that among the Turkish Cypriot population there would be those that suspect the same of Greece although I for one do not share that view with regards to Greece.
I believe that the Turkish side is looking for a fudged solution that will enable it in the future, however far off , to first claim Independence for the North knowing that with the backing it has already from the USA and to a lesser degree other European states it will be very difficult if not impossible to take the North back to the position it finds itself in at the moment with regards to recognition from the rest of the world.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 15:56

Christoph from USA comments:

Talks will go on until a GOOD and WORKABLE plan is arrived at. The Annan Plan was neither. Cypriots can wait. Can Turkey? Word has it if their EU accession doesn't make progress this year it will be shelved-permanently.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 15:29

Cenk Hoca comments:

Somebody please put all us Cypriots out of our misery and end these nonsense talks. Is obvious that we cant go on any longer.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 15:20

Mary Atkins from london comments:

To Antifon.

Stick to the commnets made by the article. That is the "alleged" suffocating time frames claimed by the Greek Cypriots.
This is NOT a form to be discussing the kurdish issue. I am sure there are other platforms for that if you are interested. If you need help I can find out for you.
This is about Cyprus and the negotiations to unite the Cyprus people. NOT kurdish. Is that clear for you?

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 14:48

PeaceFrom Istanbul from Turkey comments:

Antifon you are not as smart as you think, you are confused and sad.
It is not a time to bring in Kurdish problem in Turkey while you lost %38 of the Cyprus. But if you want some figures here they are, JUST FOR YOU.
80% of Turkish Kurd’s voted for main stream parties which reflect the level of integration of Kurds into Turkish Society, the radicals supporting terror amount to just 5% of Turkey’s population, Turkey is now fulfilling its obligations to award everyone its cultural rights.

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 13:15

Robert Taylor from London comments:

To Pessimist,

In another decade or two the talks will be Turkish Cypriots (a majorty) and Greek Cypriots (a minority). It does not take a brain surgeon to work out that

Sun, February 7th 2010 at 13:05

The Pessimist from Nicosia comments:

Surely, we are in no hurry. The talks can go on for another decade or two, provided Comrade Dimitri and Talat are still in office. The only problem is that, in another decade, the talks might be between Greek Cypriots and Turkey, as Turkish Cypriots will probably leave the island in disappointment.