Whereas its spiritual predecessor Yes, Minister offered a world of polished deceit and gentlemanly obstruction, The Thick of It proves rather more profane in its satire.

Here, ministers are compromised, mandarins panicked, and all perpetually on the verge of professional extinction. The engine of this chaos is, of course, Malcolm Tucker, played with volcanic precision by Peter Capaldi.

Tucker is less a character than a force of nature who communicates almost exclusively in threats, invective and baroque profanity.

His resemblance to Alastair Campbell is not accidental, though the comparison is less biographical than symbolic.

Tucker represents the age of spin distilled to its purest form, where power resides not in elected office but in the management of perception.

Ministers come and go, but the enforcer remains, prowling the corridors with a vocabulary that could strip paint.

Yet to reduce the show to Tucker alone would be to miss its wider achievement.

Armando Iannucci has constructed a world in which incompetence is systemic, where a stray remark metastasises into a national crisis, and policy is little more than an afterthought.

Ministers are creatures of vanity and fear, forever seeking to project authority while privately pleading for guidance.

Civil servants, once the quiet custodians of continuity, appear here as weary accomplices in a system that rewards evasion over clarity.

Among them, figures such as the hapless Hugh Abbot or the chronically anxious Nicola Murray stand out not as caricatures but as recognisable types, the sort of people one suspects populate real offices of state.

What distinguishes The Thick of It from its predecessors is its unadulterated cynicism.

There is no lingering belief that politics, beneath the noise, is guided by principle.

The dry wit lies not only in the insults but in the precision with which absurdity is revealed.

A policy initiative collapses under the weight of its own incoherence; a media appearance unravels in real time; a career ends over a phrase that should never have been uttered.

If Yes, Minister reassured audiences that the system, however flawed, was ultimately rational, The Thick of It suggests rather that the system has adapted to chaos and now thrives on it.